MESSAGE FROM YOUR CHAIRMAN
Hi, All
On the 25th September 2023, we held our AGM and the committee members for the coming year were appointed: Chair – Geoff Jamieson; Vice Chair – Keith Lyle; Secretary – Ceridwyn Jamieson; Treasurer, Membership and Administrator – Jane Bursey; Digital Convener – Derek Goldman; Public Relations – Coral Surtees; Outings – Betzi Pierce; Editor – Maureen Miller; Website – Marian Shinn; PSSA submissions – Jorge Rebelo. I would like to thank them all for offering to serve the club this year. Special thanks go to Peter Brandt who served as our Vice Chair last year, and to Keith and Ceridwyn who have joined us.
Geoff
From your editor’s desk
I thought perhaps we needed something to make us laugh this month, so I hope you enjoy the cartoon.
Buy and sell
Anyone who is thinking of upgrading their camera equipment – I’ve been asked by a relative to help her sell two lenses, but when I mentioned it in SF August, I didn’t have the tech details – apologies.
Here are the deets of the first-mentioned lens, but I didn’t have time to get those for the second one from her as she was going away:
Canon EF-100-4oo mm, f4.5-5.6, L is ii usm L lens in excellent condition with box and carrying case – R18 000.00.
I did not have time to get the tech details for the lens below from the owner, as she is now away for a short while, but the details I supplied in the last issue remain the same, ie:
Canon EF 6D full frame lens. Very good condition with original box. Always had the same lens on, so very clean inside. Some external signs of use, but nothing serious.
7019 iterations. R6 500.00.
Should you be interested in either of these lenses, please either give me a call or drop me a line and I’ll put you in touch with the owner.
Maureen
Judges’ corner
For those looking for info on this month’s theme, Triptychs/Diptychs, take a look at this article.
During this and the following two editions I will share some content from Robert Adams’ book Why People Photograph. We will look at three valid yet totally different approaches to looking at and critiquing three different photographs. They will not all gel with you, but it is an introduction, perhaps, to a different approach to looking at images than what many of us are used to.
In this issue we will look at John Baldessari discussing a ‘junk’ photo he bought:
(click on the photo to view larger)
I buy a lot of pictures nobody wants, odd movie publicity stills that used to be ten cents a piece, and are now up to twenty-five cents each. I started looking at these kinds of pictures not because they were from movies, but because early on, I was looking for photographs to incorporate into my own work that didn’t involve my own sensibility.
I went to places that sold movie stills every few weeks, and I would spend hours and hours looking through disorganized cardboard boxes of photographs until my eyes started to go out. I liked the randomness of going through these pictures. I pulled photos intuitively, things I thought I could use in making my own pieces. I have to use pictures that are banal, so banal that they are not very interesting by themselves, but have some charge that begins to work when I shove one of them up against another. They’re pictures that have some hold on me.
There are some pictures I’ve bought but have never been able to use. Like this one, which is so charged in subject matter that all I can do is just show it to people. In all my searching, I’ve never found anything like this picture. There’s something very troubling and sad about it. It speaks about sexuality in some way as death and dirt. There’s also something very judgmental about it, something bipolar, This picture seems like it’s about strange and overlapping sensibilities.
Why would anybody make a picture like this? I cannot figure it out. It’s so enigmatic. There are really weird overtones in it: beauty, birth and death, pain, decay. It’s very open. You can read so much into it. What’s out the window? Could be clouds. You can look at this picture from now until doomsday, and still have no idea about what is going on. I know why I like all of the other pictures I have. There’s no another one that eludes me, like this one does. I’ve had this picture around for a long time. And although I’ve always loved it, it’s just too good to use in my own work.
When I used to categorize the pictures I bought, this one got placed in the folder called ‘art’, because it’s so perfectly composed. In some way, it seems to comment on art. It’s got the quality of being both here and there. The backs of movie stills usually have captions printed on them, and this one does, too. It says, ‘Assembly Line of Beauty-3. Emerging from the ‘‘Bubble Bath,’’ Dolores Casey will halt behind the flimsy screen for a rubdown, after which she dons a negligee, also the creation of one of the famed Parisian designers’. It was number three of a sequence, but I can’t imagine what the other pictures might have been like. The caption implies that she’s going to come out of this bubble bath, go behind this screen, go to get a massage – no a ‘rubdown’.
It’s mysterious. There’s something on the left, behind what I guess is a curtain, which looks like a figure out of a Masaccio painting. A figure going to hell. It’s wearing a towel. Maybe it’s being transformed. And this figure on the right, covered in suds, is very sensual. The idea of soap or suds, cleansing like fire. The picture has a lot of religious overtones to it, I suppose. But then when you look at this part in the center, suddenly the picture moves off into another area. Once I was going to use this photo to make a reference to Barnett Newman’s paintings or to Jackson Pollock’s Blue Poles. But it was just too good.
This picture became important to me because it’s a reminder of what happens when art becomes too beautiful. I admire it, but on the other hand, it provokes me, and maybe I’m resentful about that. I would like to make something so perfect, but on my terms. I mean this is brilliant. Look at the divisions. The negative space is very important, as important as anything else. Compositionally, why would anybody put what looks like artificial fingers in front of the rope on those poles? That idea wouldn’t come to you in a million years. It drives me mad trying to figure that out. That hand, it’s gorgeous. How the fingers repeat the poles. How the poles are bound. Those decisions have to figure into the story the photographer was trying to tell. It was a brilliant move. This picture is almost Cocteau-like, dreamy, and the longer I look at it, the weirder it gets.
In fact, this picture has a lot to do with an artist’s dream of becoming artless. What is great about this picture is that it is stupid. Artists all want to be stupid, in a good way, and artless. It gets to the root of a fundamental question for artists. When does something flip? At what point does something become art? When is something not art? It happens on a sliding scale, and I’m always interested in finding the point when a picture all of the sudden goes over the edge, in one way or another. All it would take to make this picture not art is just a slight shift in its arrangement. As it is, this picture smacks of art, because it’s so composed and such a beautiful image. This picture does just what an artist does. Takes a piece of dirt and keeps doing something with it, until it’s still a piece of dirt and it’s art. But how do you keep its ‘dirtness’? It’s a pretty hard line to walk. Its either dirt, or its art. Just where do you stop? When do you push it too far? At what point do you kill it? It takes a lifetime to learn how to do that. You never want to make something so totally beautiful that it doesn’t leave any room for a person to enter it. That would be boring.
Usually, when you say something can be art, it’s because you’ve found a precedent for it in art that already exists, You say to yourself, ‘It looks like that’. The things that are resistant, you might say, ‘Why not? Why couldn’t it be art? What can I do to push it over the edge?’. But this picture starts and ends at the absolute ground zero level of what art is. It is enough to make me catatonic.
It would kill me if this picture looked anything like the art I make. I don’t want to give people something comfortable to look at. I want to upset people. This is too beautiful, too comfortable. I always distrust beauty. I’m very jittery about it. There is no way that this is not a beautiful picture. No way.
Next issue we will look at Robert Adams tackling a photo by Susan Meiselas, and the issue after that, Peter Godwin on a Rob Cooper photograph of Robert Mugabe.
See you at the next meeting
Peter
Winners of Digital Image of the Month (September 2023)
Evaluation of Digital Photography
Digital Entries | |||||
Title | Category | Author | Star | Score | Award |
Arc Sparks | Open | Didi Franklin | 3 | 11 | Gold |
At Work | Open | Johan Kloppers | MB | 12 | Gold |
Beacon of light | Open | Keith Lyle | 4 | 10 | Silver |
Burst of Sunshine | Open | Marie-Louise Cardwell | 2 | 9 | Gold |
Citadel Sun | Architecture | Mike Wesson | 3 | 9 | Silver |
Cornwall Cove | Open | Didi Franklin | 3 | 9 | Silver |
Daybreak Splash | Nature | Marian Shinn | 1 | 10 | Gold |
Don’t Mess with my Baby | Wildlife | Lorne Sulcas | 4 | 11 | Gold |
Early Morning Swimmers | Scapes | Peter Brandt | MB | 12 | Gold |
Facade | Architecture | Derek Goldman | 4 | 10 | Silver |
Fractulus | Open | Sharon Crowther | 1 | 10 | Gold |
Glistening Grey Seal | Wildlife | Patrick Cardwell | 2 | 9 | Gold |
Grubs Up! | Open | Patrick Cardwell | 2 | 10 | Gold |
Lazy Afternoon | Open | Geoff Jamieson | 4 | 10 | Silver |
Lean and Mean | Wildlife | Marie-Louise Cardwell | 2 | 12 | COM |
Lone Tree | Landscape | Ceridwyn Jamieson | 4 | 8 | Bronze |
Open the Pod Bay Doors | Open | Margaret Silk | 1 | 9 | Gold |
Reflections | Open | Ceridwyn Jamieson | 4 | 8 | Bronze |
River Road | Landscape | Derek Goldman | 4 | 9 | Silver |
Scraping the Sky | Open | Sharon Crowther | 1 | 9 | Gold |
Sea Patterns | Open | Lynn Toms | 3 | 9 | Silver |
Sleepy Hamlet | Open | Lynn Toms | 3 | 9 | Silver |
Slow Horses | Open | Margaret Silk | 1 | 9 | Gold |
Stalling | Sports | Peter Brandt | MB | 11 | Silver |
Staring Eyes | Nature | Johan Kloppers | MB | 13 | COM |
Surfer school | Open | Marian Shinn | 1 | 9 | Gold |
Too Late for a Sail | Open | Maureen Miller | 3 | 8 | Silver |
Water at Last | Open | Maureen Miller | 3 | 8 | Silver |
Wet Cat | Wildlife | Lorne Sulcas | 4 | 11 | Gold |
Wet Work | Open | Geoff Jamieson | 4 | 8 | Bronze |
Winners of Theme Image of the Month – Shadows (September 2023)
EVALUATION OF THEME IMAGES – AUGUST 2023
Digital Entries | ||||
Title | Author | Star | Score | Award |
Beehive and Bird | Didi Franklin | 3 | 11 | Gold |
Cruise Liner | Derek Goldman | 4 | 11 | Gold |
Doll’s House | Peter Brandt | MB | 9 | None |
Fanwork | Geoff Jamieson | 4 | 11 | Gold |
Grandeur | Lynn Toms | 3 | 9 | Silver |
High Rise | Coral Surtees | 4 | 9 | Silver |
New Woodstock | Mike Weson | 3 | 8 | Silver |
Oast house style | Marie-Louise Cardwell | 2 | 10 | Gold |
Pulteney Bridge Bath | Ceridwyn Jamieson | 4 | 9 | Silver |
Saigon Suspension Bridge | Marian Shinn | 1 | 9 | Gold |
Shaping Up | Margaret Silk | 1 | 9 | Gold |
SineSymmetry | Mark Diamond | 1 | 9 | Gold |
Winging It | Sharon Crowther | 1 | 8 | Gold |
Salons
Salon dates for the following year are available from the PSSA website under the tab Salon Calendar and Results for the Year Ending June 2023, or from www.photovaultonline.com
All the brochures containing details are available on both the PSSA and Photovault websites.
Please see our record-keeping page for information on how to submit your salon acceptances to our club records.
Themes and Outings
Click here to view our themes and outings for 2023.
Formats and sizes of photo submissions, and naming conventions
Click here to find see the specifications for digital and print submissions.
Our committee
Click here to view our 2023 committee or to contact them.